Close Menu
Surgical Times
    X (Twitter) Instagram TikTok
    Surgical Times
    • The Pulse
    • Under the Knife
    • Daily Chart
    • Cutting Edge
    • Doc Talk
    Thursday • May 8, 2025
    Surgical Times
    Home»The Pulse

    Signature Clinic Sued Patients Who Left Bad Reviews, Wouldn’t Delete, Edit

    Clinic says it gave all clients “the option of editing ‘defamatory’ comments” before resorting to legal action.
    By Anthony BolstadDecember 18, 2023

    A multi-location cosmetic surgery clinic in the UK has sued a handful of former patients who independently left reviews it felt were defamatory or damaging to its business.

    Signature Clinic, rated 5-stars by some 90 percent of alleged patients on TrustPilot, is one of the UK’s largest cosmetic surgery chains.

    It operates eight service locations, claims to have treated more than 20,000 patients, and has assets of ‘nearly £3-million,’ or about $3,798,600 USD.

    Signature Clinic has been accused of “using the law to try to silence patients who are unhappy with their treatment,” according to an original report published Monday by The Times.

    TrustPilot records 469 total reviews for UK’s Signature Clinic, of which 90% are allegedly 5-star. December 18, 2023.
    TrustPilot advises visitors that UK’s Signature Clinic “has been pressuring people to remove or edit their negative reviews.” This notice appeared prior to the Times’ coverage of the clinic, and the allegations of legal and other pressure from Signature are shared by multiple reviewers, dating back to at least January of 2023.

    “The fear of imprisonment should stop those itchy fingers.”

    Signature solicitor Jaroslaw Stachiw, to former Signature patient who ‘complained about her blepharoplasty surgery on Facebook.’ | The Times, “Cosmetic Surgery Firm Sues Customers Over Negative Reviews,” Monday, Dec. 18, 2023
    In this Times graphic, former Signature Clinic patient Kate Kronenbach is pictured. She is being sued by Signature for alleged defamation. Signature is seeking up to £10,000, or $12,662 USD.

    Former patient Kate Kronenbach, 51, is being sued by UK’s Signature Clinic after leaving a review on Trustpilot in May 2023, about an arm lift surgery she underwent with Dr. Aiofe Turner at the Signature Clinic in April 2022.

    Signature is seeking up to £10,000, or $12,662 USD. (Dr. Turner later left Signature.)

    Another individual, identified only as Mohammed, ~40, is being sued by UK’s Signature Clinic for defamation after posting a Trustpilot review about the cosmetic eyelid surgery he received at Signature, in May of 2023.

    Mohammed can no longer fully close his eyes.

    Mohammed had described his surgery publicly, in July 2023, as “highly unsatisfactory,” while suggesting Signature was a “conveyor belt practice.”

    After refusing to remove his review, Signature served him with a defamation suit seeking £10,000, or roughly $12,662 USD.

    While the U.S. cosmetic surgery industry is well acquainted with the occasional lawsuits filed by providers against their patients, expert sources consulted by the Times suggest that Signature’s use of these lawsuits marks a first-ever use case for the nation.

    “Signature Clinic’s use of lawsuits appear to be the first major attempt to silence consumers who place unflattering reviews online,” The Times reported, with insight from the UK’s Free Speech Union.

    Signature Clinic, one of the country’s largest cosmetic surgery chains has been accused of using legal threats to try to silence former patients who complained about their treatments — the FSU is currently providing assistance to six of those patients.https://t.co/EUnuyNE0Vr pic.twitter.com/FV8uWxHATL

    — The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) December 18, 2023

    Such lawsuits are known as Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, or SLAPP suits, a criteria determined only by judicial review.

    Signature maintains that the six lawsuits that it has filed against former patients and one other individual are not SLAPP suits.

    That it has the legal right to address “untrue or defamatory” reviews.

    “It said it was ‘entitled to protect the goodwill in its name and its business reputation as an asset of value,” the Times reports.

    View this post on Instagram

    A post shared by Signature Clinic (@signatureclinicuk)

    Ethics Legal World
    Top News

    Superior Court Strikes SLAPP Suit Brought by Surgery Center

    Breast Implant Statistics

    America’s Best Plastic Surgeons Announced

    Do I Need to Replace My Implants Every 10 Years?

    Top Exclusives

    Death Prompts Public Dig Into Surgeon’s Past: Jessica Jones’s ‘Justice for Hillary’

    Infrared Saunas a ‘Catalyst’ for ‘Breast Implant Illness’ Healthcare CEO Says

    FDA Analysis: Top 10 Symptoms of BII, Reported Rate of Improvement Post Explant

    Surgeon Counters Claims he Botched Woman’s Nose, Deletes Bad Reviews

    Objective. Independent. Informative. Public interest reporting on the practice of plastic surgery not affiliated with or funded by any surgeon, device manufacturer, or practice.

    Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok Facebook YouTube Pinterest
    • Terms
    • Contact
    • Privacy

    © 2025 Surgical Times. All Rights Reserved.

    • Best Of
    • Brazilian Butt Lift Surgery
    • Breast Implants
    • Breast Implant Illness
    • Celebrities
    • Death
    • Ethics
    • Exclusive
    • Florida
    • Uplifting
    • Legal
    • Marketing
    • Mold
    • Money
    • Podcasts
    • Safety
    • Social
    • Statistics
    • Studies
    • Türkiye
    • U.S.
    • U.S. FDA
    • World
    • Press Releases

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.